Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by law." It really is properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Thus, the competent authority of the parent department of the petitioner and also the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount from the petitioner and spend the pension amount and other ancillary benefits into the petitioner to which he is entitled under the regulation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of the respondent is also directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
4. It has been noticed by this Court that there can be a delay of sooner or later from the registration of FIR which has not been explained because of the complainant. Moreover, there isn't any eye-witness of your alleged event along with the prosecution is depending on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession with the petitioners has become tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened to get the real brothers of your deceased but they didn't react in the least towards the confessional statements with the petitioners and calmly saw them leaving, just one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not look much inspiring or natural. The read more petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is not any explanation as to why her arrest was not effected after making from the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on countless instances that extra judicial confession of an accused can be a weak form of evidence which may be manoeuvred through the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not arrive their way. The prosecution is also counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word regarding presence of some light on the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners alongside one another on a motorcycle at 4.
maintaining the conviction awarded to your appellant reduce the sentence of your appellant from imprisonment for life to 1 already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)
Because of their position between the two main systems of regulation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as blended systems of legislation.
Please use one username and password established from the options. If it does not work please consider the other. Each and every allows single user access only - so please remember to log off properly when you have finished your session in Manupatra.
The ruling of the first court created case law that must be followed by other courts until finally or Except if both new regulation is created, or maybe a higher court rules differently.
Upholding Justice: The application with the law as well as subsequent punishment from the guilty party supply a perception of closure and justice to the target’s family and loved types.
This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based over the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of your case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. Read more
2. I have read the learned counsel for the parties as well as acquired DPG at duration, perused the record and noticed that:-
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses for instance self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which may well lead to reduced charges or acquittal.
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury into a person, by performing an act which from the ordinary course of nature is probably going to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently harmful that it must in all probability cause death, causes the death on the these kinds of person, is said to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case law previously rendered on similar cases.